Learning motivation and student achievement : description analysis and relationships both

Abstract

Education is very important for humans, through the education throughout the world will increasingly flourish. However, if faced with the activities within the learning process, not a few men (students) who have less motivation in learning activities. This resulted in fewer maximal learning processes and in turn will affect student achievement. This study focuses to discuss matters relating to the motivation to learn and student achievement, with the aim of strengthening the importance of motivation in the learning process so that a clear relationship with student achievement. The method used is descriptive analysis and simple correlation to the 97 students taking the course introduction to Microeconomics and Indonesian. The conclusion from this research is the students have a good record if it has a well and motivated as well, and this study concludes their tie's difference between learning motivation and achievement of students on two different courses.

Keywords
  • Learning motivation
  • student achievement
  • descriptive and simple correlation analysis.
How to Cite
Riswanto, A., & Aryani, S. (2017). Learning motivation and student achievement : description analysis and relationships both. COUNS-EDU: The International Journal of Counseling and Education, 2(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.23916/002017026010
References
  1. Al-Ani, W. T. (2013). Blended Learning Approach Using Moodle and Student’s Achievement at Sultan Qaboos University in Oman. Journal of Education & Learning, 2(3), 96–110. http://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v2n3p96
  2. Aminah, I. S. S. ; Y. S. (2014). Pengaruh Lingkungan Keluarga, Lingkungan Sekolah, Disiplin Belajar dan Motivasi Belajar terhadap Prestasi Belajar Ekonomi Siswa SMA Kelas XI IPS SMA PGRI 1 Taman Pemalang. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 3(1), 46–51.
  3. Arens, a. K., Morin, A. J. S., & Watermann, R. (2015). Relations between classroom disciplinary problems and student motivation: Achievement as a potential mediator? Learning and Instruction, 39, 184–193. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.07.001
  4. Bamiro, A. O. (2015). Effects of Guided Discovery and Think-Pair-Share Strategies on Secondary School Students’ Achievement in Chemistry. SAGE Open, 5(1), 1–7. http://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014564754
  5. Daniko, P. (2012). Hubungan Antara Pemahaman Materi, Motivasi Belajar, Dan Prestasi Belajar Pada Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Taman Dewasa Ibu Pawiyatan Yogyakarta Tahun 2012. Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta.
  6. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher Quality and Student Achievement : A Review of State Policy Evidence Previous Research. Education, 8(1), 1–44. http://doi.org/10.1038/sj.clp
  7. Djamarah, S. B. (2008). Psikologi Belajar (Kedua). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  8. Endang Sri Astuti, R. (2010). Bahan Dasar Untuk Pelayanan Konseling Pada Satuan Pendidikan Menengah (1st ed.). Jakarta: grasindo.
  9. Firmender, J. M., Gavin, M. K., & McCoach, D. B. (2014). Examining the Relationship Between Teachers’ Instructional Practices and Students' Mathematics Achievement. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(3), 214–236. http://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X14538032
  10. Gietz, C., & McIntosh, K. (2014). Relations Between Student Perceptions of Their School Environment and Academic Achievement. Canadian Journal of School Psychology , 29 (3 ), 161–176. http://doi.org/10.1177/0829573514540415
  11. Gottfried, M. (2012). Peer Effects in Urban Schools: Assessing the Impact of Classroom Composition on Student Achievement. Educational Policy, 28(5), 607–647. http://doi.org/10.1177/0895904812467082
  12. Heck, R. H. (2007). Examining the Relationship Between Teacher Quality as an Organizational Property of Schools and Students’ Achievement and Growth Rates. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(4), 399–432. http://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X07306452
  13. Husein, U. (2011). Metode Penelitian Untuk Skripsi dan Tesis Bisnis (11th ed.). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  14. Jennings, P. a, & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The Prosocial Classroom: Teacher Social and Emotional Competence in Relation to Student and Classroom Outcomes. Source: Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525. http://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693
  15. Joy, Hamilton, T., & Ekeke. (2013). Conceptual Framework Of Teachers’ Competence In Relation To Students’ Academic Achievement. International Journal of Networks and Systems, 2(3), 6.
  16. Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional Competence of Teachers: Effects on Instructional Quality and Student Development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0032583
  17. Lee, J., Liu, X., Amo, L. C., & Wang, W. L. (2013). Multilevel Linkages Between State Standards, Teacher Standards, and Student Achievement: Testing External Versus Internal Standards-Based Education Models. Educational Policy, 28(6), 780–811. http://doi.org/10.1177/0895904813475708
  18. Levpuscek, M. P., & Zupancic, M. (2008). Math Achievement in Early. Journal of Early Adolescence, XX(X), 1–30. http://doi.org/10.1177/0272431608324189
  19. Linnenbrink, E.A., Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an Enable for Academic Success. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 313 – 327.
  20. McInerney, D. M., Cheng, R. W.-Y., Mok, M. M. C., & Lam, a K. H. (2012). Academic self-concept and learning strategies: Direction of effect on student academic achievement. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23(3), 249–269. http://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X12451020
  21. Mudjiono, D. (2009). Belajar dan Pebelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  22. Muzenda, A. (2013). Lecturer s ’ Competences and Students ’ Academic Performance. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(1), 6–13.
  23. Nemeth, J., & Long, J. G. (2012). Assessing Learning Outcomes in U.S. Planning Studio Courses. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(4), 476–490. http://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X12453740
  24. Omar, S., Jain, J., & Noordin, F. (2013). Motivation in Learning and Happiness among the Low Science Achievers of a Polytechnic Institution: An Exploratory Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90(InCULT 2012), 702–711. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.143
  25. Ottmar, E. R., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Larsen, R. a., & Berry, R. Q. (2015). Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching, Standards-Based Mathematics Teaching Practices, and Student Achievement in the Context of the Responsive Classroom Approach. American Educational Research Journal, 52(4), 787–821. http://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215579484
  26. Porter, T. S., Riley, T. M., & Ruffer, R. L. (2004). A Review of the Use of Simulations in Teaching Economics. Social Science Computer Review, 22(4), 426–443. http://doi.org/10.1177/0894439304268464
  27. Shatzer, R. H., Caldarella, P., Hallam, P. R., & Brown, B. L. (2013). Comparing the effects of instructional and transformational leadership on student achievement: Implications for practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(4), 445–459. http://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213502192
  28. Siska Eko Mawarsih, D. (2013). Pengaruh Perhatian Orang Tua dan Motivasi Belajar terhadap Presatsi Belajar Siswa SMA Negeri Jumapolo. JUPE UNS, 1(3), 1–13.
  29. Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
  30. Swanson, J., Valiente, C., Lemery-Chalfant, K., & Caitlin O’Brien, T. (2011). Predicting Early Adolescents’ Academic Achievement, Social Competence, and Physical Health From Parenting, Ego Resilience, and Engagement Coping. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(4), 548–576. http://doi.org/10.1177/0272431610366249
  31. Syaiful, S. (2012). Kemampuan Professional Guru Dan Tenaga Kependidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  32. Tirtarahardja, U dan La Sulo, S. L. (2012). Pengantar Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  33. Uma, S. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian untuk Bisnis (4th ed.). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  34. Wayne, A. J., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89–122. http://doi.org/10.3102/00346543073001089.