Individual counseling to argue in social media
-
Published: March 31, 2017
-
Page: 35-41
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to improve students' argumentation skills in social media. The subjects were 20 students who were divided into two groups: the control group consisting of 10 people and the experimental group consisting of 10 people. The technique used was an quasi experiment with 10 interventions using individualized counseling services to the control group and experimental group. Based on the quasi experimental results by giving counseling to 20 students 10 times and analyzed, students' argumentation skill level increased after individual counseling. Shown with change of skill level of argumentation before treatment (preliminary evaluation) and after (final evaluation) as much as 90 points and through test using test with significance level 5% show t count = 7.077> t table = 2,179. Based on the results of these calculations, show that the hypothesis mentions individual counseling affect students' argumentation skills can be accepted.
- Argument Skills
- Social Media
- Individual Counseling
- Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (2012). Social indicators of well-being: Americans' perceptions of life quality. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Arfitriani, Y. N. (2010). Upaya Meningkatkan Kepercayaan Diri Pada Siswa Broken Home Melalui Konseling Individual Dengan Pendekatan Realita.
- Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2002). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan dan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
- Coolican, H. (1990). Research methods and statistics in psychology. Hodder & Stoughton Educational.
- Gibson, R.L. & Mitchell, M.H. 2011. Bimbingan dan Konseling. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
- Howell, D. C. (2012). Statistical methods for psychology. Cengage Learning.
- Hulukati, W. (2013). The improvement of teacher competencies in guidance and counseling for the development of students personality. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 4 (3), 396.
- Ifdil, I. (2013). Konseling Online Sebagai Salah Satu Bentuk Pelayanan E-konseling. Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan, 1(1), 15-22.
- Katz, J., Capron, A. M., & Glass, E. S. (1972). Experimentation with human beings: The authority of the investigator, subject, professions, and state in the human experimentation process. Russell Sage Foundation.
- Keraf, Gorys. (1981). Argumentasi dan Narasi (Komposisi Lanjutan III). Jakarta: PT GramediPustaka Utama.
- Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social psychology quarterly, 121-140.
- MacArthur, J. F., & Mack, W. A. (2017). Counseling: How to Counsel Biblically. HarperCollins Christian Publishing.
- Prayitno, E. A. (2004). Dasar-dasar Bimbingan dan Konseling. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
- Restu, Y. (2013). Studi Tentang Perilaku Agresif Siswa di Sekolah. Konselor, 2(1).
- Schmidt, J.J. (2008). Counseling in School. New York: Pearson.
- Serketich, W. J., & Dumas, J. E. (1996). The effectiveness of behavioral parent training to modify antisocial behavior in children: A meta-analysis. Behavior therapy, 27(2), 171-186.
- Shanty, R. M. N., & Christiana, E. (2013). Pelaksanaan Layanan Konseling Individudi SMPN Se-Kecamatan Bangsal Mojokerto. Jurnal BK UNESA, 3(1), 388-393.
- Soffyan S. Wilis. (2004). Konseling Individual Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Alfabeta.
- Surat Edaran Kapolri SE/06/X/2015.
- Weston, Anthony. (2007). Kaidah Berargumentasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
