Level of students` self-efficacy based on gender
-
Published: December 31, 2016
-
Page: 29-33
Abstract
This research is aimed at describing the condition of both male and female students self-efficacy and identifying the difference. This research is a quantitative research with descriptive-comparative. The samples included 221 students. The data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics normal curve by determining the mean (average); calculating the percentage that exists in a particular category and analyzing t-test. The findings of the research showed 42.7% of male students self-efficacy are at moderate category of and 47.2% of female students are at high category. This research also revealed a significant difference of both female and male students self-efficacy. The implication of the research is it is expected that counselors provide guidance and counseling services to improve and develop self-efficacy, especially towards male students as self-efficacy of male students is lower than female students.Keywords
- Self-Efficacy
- Gender
How to Cite
Ifdil, I., Apriani, R., Yendi, F. M., & Rangka, I. B. (2016). Level of students` self-efficacy based on gender. COUNS-EDU: The International Journal of Counseling and Education, 1(1), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.23916/29-33.0016.11-i41b
References
- Anas Sudijono. (2005). PengantarEvaluasiPendidikan. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindoPersada.
- Arikunto, S. (2002). Metodologipenelitian. Jakarta: Penerbit PT. RinekaCipta.
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.Jurnal of Psychological Review, (Online), Vol.84.no.2, 101-215.
- Colles M, Hall C. (2002). Gendered readings: learning from childrens reading choice. Journal of research in reading, (Online) Vol.25.no.1, 96-108.
- de Vries, P. G. (1986). Stratified random sampling Sampling Theory for Forest Inventory (pp. 31-55): Springer.
- DinniJufitaPutri. (2013). Analisis Gender terhadapSelf-efficacy, Self Regulated Learning, danPrestasiAkademikRemajadalamPelajaranMatematikadan Bahasa Indonesia. Skripsitidakditerbitkan. Bogor: InstitutPertanian Bogor.
- Effendi, S., &Politik, I. (2007). PerspektifAdministrasi Pembangunan KualitasManusiadanKualitasMasyarakat.
- Feist, J. & Feist, G. J. (2011). Theories of Personality. TerjemahanolehSmitaPrathitaSjahputri. Yogyakarta: PustakaBelajar.
- Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction: Longman Publishing.
- Hariandja, M. T. E., &Hardiwati, Y. (2002). Manajemensumberdayamanusia: Grasindo.
- Kumar R, Lal R. (2006). The role of self-efficacy and gender difference among adolescents. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology., (Online), Vol.63.no.1,128-138.
- Levy, P. S., &Lemeshow, S. (2013). Sampling of populations: methods and applications: John Wiley & Sons.
- Martono N, Puspitasari E, Mintarti, Rostikawati R.(2009). Perbedaan Gender dalamPrestasiBelajarMahasiswaUnsoed, in press.
- Pintrich PR, Groot EV. (1990). Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of ClassroomAcademic Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, (Online), Vol.82.no.1, 33-40.
- Raub, S., & Liao, H. (2012). Doing the right thing without being told: joint effects of initiative climate and general self-efficacy on employee proactive customer service performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 651.
- Riyadi, D. I. D. M. M. (2000). Pembangunan Daerah melaluiPengembangan Wilayah: Makalahpada acara DiseminasidanDiskusi Program Pengembangan Daerah danPengembanganEkonomiMasyarakat di Daerah, Bogor.
- Samuels, M. L., Witmer, J. A., &Schaffner, A. (2012). Statistics for the life sciences: Pearson education.
- Santoso, S. (2003). StatistikDeskriptif: KonsepdanAplikasidengan MS Excel dan SPSS.
- Santrock, J. W. (2012). Life Span DevelopmentPerkembangan Masa Hidup. Jakarta: Erlangga.
- Stokes, M. E., Davis, C. S., & Koch, G. G. (2012). Categorical data analysis using SAS: SAS institute.
